The Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (Icasa) has initiated a six- to eight-month high-level study of competition in South Africa’s information and communication technology (ICT) sector.

South Africa’s “fluid and volatile” ICT sector was heading for a crossroad similar to that experienced by the US in the 1980s, explained Icasa chairperson Dr Stephen Mncube at a press briefing on the launch of the inquiry at Icasa’s head office, in Sandton.

There was a need to reappraise the nation’s ICT sector, in particular competition, on the back of rapid technological changes with “far-reaching” implications.

Icasa councillor Willie Currie said, while the “wide-ranging” inquiry “to develop a full appreciation of the implication of these unfolding changes and developments on the regulation of competition in the ICT sector” was not a Chapter 8 review, in terms of the Electronic Communications Act, of a specific market, the study could potentially identify certain markets in need of further scrutiny.

The inquiry would seek to determine the state of competition in the sector in its entirety, address challenges hampering the creation of a level playing field across platforms, understand the impact of convergences, net neutrality and disruptive technologies on the competitive landscape, and understand the role of fixed-line and wireless networks in enabling competition, Currie said.

“Within the different market segments of the ICT industry, there are many competition issues to be addressed. “Competition needs to be enhanced at both the infrastructural and services layers of the industry,” South Africa Communications Forum (SACF) executive director Loren Braithwaite-Kabosha said.

The SACF, which “strongly” supported what it deemed to be a long-overdue process, suggested the inquiry address the levelling of the playing field in terms of content access by broadcasters, infrastructure sharing, the inter-operability of set-top boxes, the efficient use of spectrum and the objectives and impact of dif-ferent types of licensing regimes, among others.

“One area in which these [technological] changes are more pronounced is in the competi- tiveness of the electronic communications, broadcasting and postal sectors and the assumption is that greater competition will lead to a reduction in the cost to communicate,” Icasa noted.

Despite a considerable flux in the electronic communications network services (ECNS) and electronic communications services (ECS) markets, which now boasted about 720 ECNS and ECS licensees – 416 of which were operational – the cost to communicate had not declined significantly.

With South Africa’s consumers paying more than their counterparts in the rest of Africa, in reality, increased competition had not led to an automatic reduction in the cost to communicate.

“Another issue is [the] impact any consolidation of the market will have on the state of competition, the cost to communicate and bridging the digital divide,” Icasa said.

The authority expressed its concerns over the implications of “unprecedented” market consolidation on competition and the cost to communicate, citing plans by South Africa’s two largest mobile operators, MTN and Vodacom – which, combined, held more than 80% of the market – to buy out other ECNS/ECS licensees.

This came as Vodacom was within weeks of completing its due diligence to acquire 100% of Neotel and as MTN and telecommunications group Telkom entered network management services and reciprocal roaming agreements, which would see MTN take over financial and operational responsibility for the roll-out and operation of Telkom’s radio access network.

Further, Icasa questioned whether the assignment of spectrum for broadband would also have an effect on the state of competition in the ICT sector.

The market was still waiting for the Department of Communications’ release of the Spectrum Policy, which would guide Icasa on the implementation of spectrum allocation and allow the licensing of the 2.6 GHz and 800 MHz band spectrum.