https://www.miningweekly.com

Miners contest Oxfam claims of profit grabs in Africa

30th July 2019

By: Esmarie Iannucci

Creamer Media Senior Deputy Editor: Australasia

     

Font size: - +

PERTH (miningweekly.com) – Australian miners singled out in a recent report by not-for-profit group Oxfam have expressed their disappointment in the allegations made within the report.

In its recently released Tax Justice Network Tax Extractives report, Oxfam alleges that as much as $1.1-billion in profits were shifted out of Africa in 2015 alone, by Australian miners operating in the region, through the use of tax secrecy jurisdictions.

The report noted that Australian miners could be responsible for the loss of an estimated $289-million in government tax revenues.

Pointing in particular to the operations of gold miner Perseus Mining, mineral sands miner Iluka Resources and base metals miner MMG, Oxfam claimed that its investigation indicated that the miners had financial and corporate arrangements in place that could have led to significantly less tax than "the public should expect".

Oxfam’s internal estimations found that the three mines could have pad $149-million more in corporate income tax over a period of five to seven years across the three operating regions of Ghana, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Sierra Leone.

“A lack of transparency means it is not entirely possible to know if this money was not paid because of aggressive tax practices or due to legitimate deductions on mine costs. However, we do understand that these mines are privy to special or secretive tax arrangements and that each company has subsidiaries located in tax havens, which raises serious questions about their tax practices,” the report read.

“All three Australian companies provide no public financial details of their subsidiaries in tax secrecy jurisdictions (tax havens). And all of the company financial reports show consolidated, total tax payments rather than reporting in which countries taxes were actually paid around the world. Since each mine began operating, they all appear to have exploited some form of tax concession or loophole.”

The report claimed that despite "huge" revenues for each of the three Australian miners, the governments of Ghana, Sierra Leone and the DRC had received on average between 0% and 0.9% of the revenues in corporate income tax between 2009 and 2015, with the report also pointing out that the corporate tax rates in these countries were at 30%.

Perseus Mining, which produces gold from the Edikan mine in Ghana, has refuted the claims, with CEO Jeff Quartermaine noting that there were ‘numerous’ reference made to the company within the report, that were simply wrong.

“Perseus pays all taxes that are legislated as and when they fall due,” he told Mining Weekly Online.

“Perseus Mining’s Annual Report clearly sets out the company’s financial status. This report is audited each year by PricewaterhouseCoopers, and previously by Ernst & Young.

He noted that the company paid royalties amounting to 5% to the government of Ghana, and had done so since the first gold was produced at Edikan, in 2011.

In 2018 alone, this royalty amounted to $19-million.

Iluka, which operates the Sierra Rutile operation in Sierra Leone, on Tuesday told Mining Weekly Online that the report contained numerous errors of fact and misleading conclusions.

CFO Adele Stratton pointed out that the Oxfam report focused predominantly on company income tax, which is only one of a number of taxes paid by the company, which also includes royalties, levies and duties and employee personal income tax remittance.

“Focusing solely on corporate income tax significantly under represents a company’s overall economic contributions and is misleading to the readers.

“For example, Oxfam has cited that Iluka reported that Sierra Rutile paid taxes of $4.2-million in 2017 representing 3.6% of revenues. What Oxfam has reported was company income tax only, notwithstanding that Iluka had informed Oxfam that total taxes paid in 2017 was in fact $21-million, representing 20% of revenue.

“Taxes paid are split between direct taxes borne by Sierra Rutile, being corporate income tax, royalties, mining licence and surface rents and import duties and taxes collected, represented by employee pay-as-you-earn remittance and withholding taxes,” Stratton said.

Stratton pointed out that since its acquisition of the Sierra Rutile project in December 2016, the company has paid a total of $50-million in taxes, while its total tax and remittance to government is nearly $55-million.

Sierra Rutile is the largest employer in Sierra Leone, with a workforce of more than 2 500 people, of which over 98% are locals, Stratton said. In 2018 alone, the operation paid $59-million to local suppliers.

Furthermore, Stratton noted that Iluka was a great supporter of tax transparency and was one of the first signatories to the Australian Board of Tax’s voluntary tax transparency code, publishing its first tax transparency report in the 2016 income year.

Base metals miner MMG, which owns the Kinsevere copper project in the DRC, has also expressed disappointment in the report, with executive GM for stakeholder relations Troy Hey saying that while the issues covered in the report were important, the report failed to adhere to internationally-accepted accounting standards.

“MMG values the reports produced by Oxfam, however, we were disappointed to see that despite constructively engaging with Oxfam Australia and providing many opportunities for clarification, the report continues to contain material errors and omissions. Despite numerous opportunities, these were not corrected prior to publication.

“As a result, the report implies that MMG is not paying its fair share of tax and is not acting as a good corporate citizen,” Hey said.

“MMG is a major investor, taxpayer, employer and purchaser of local goods and services. We are one of the largest investors in the DRC and proud of our significant economic and social contributions. We aim for the highest standards of corporate governance, including on tax. Our approach to date has been to transparently disclose tax and royalty payments as well as broader social contributions annually.”

MMG’s 2018 sustainability report showed that the company contributed a total of $56.2-million in taxes in the DRC, in 2018 alone, and a further $44-million in 2017, with Hey saying that the company’s audited annual report found that its effective tax rate was between 55% and 53% for the 2018 and 2017 financial years respectively.

“The report contains several statements made by Oxfam Australia which relate to MMG’s tax and royalties disclosures and suggest that MMG may be seeking to mislead or engage in deceptive conduct.

“We reject any assertion that we have misreported the amount of royalties paid. The company’s annual reports and accounts are audited by Deloitte and in earlier financial years by PricewaterhouseCoopers, both internationally reputable accounting and audit firms.

“MMG’s payment of royalties has been clearly disclosed in our Annual Report for each of the years analysed by Oxfam for their report,” Hey said.

He noted that the report also failed to consider the direct investment of $931 163 that MMG made into social development initiatives in 2018, to increase the development outcomes to its host communities, which was aligned with the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals, and focused on four pillars; essentials for life, health and wellbeing, securing incomes, and education.

The Australia-Africa Minerals and Energy Group (AAMEG) has also has raised issues with the report, with CEO Bill Witham saying that the report made its conclusions based on the basic premise of assessing the amount of company tax that should be paid as a percentage of gross revenue. 

"The report does not give consideration to the taxable income of the relevant companies, despite this being the basis for paying income tax in almost all jurisdictions around the world. As a result of this basic premise, investment in capital and operating costs which are incurred upfront and often for substantial periods prior to the generation of any revenue by the company are ignored. 

"The report also does not factor in the large contributions made to these countries by mining companies through other mechanisms, such as royalties and payroll taxes paid, local employment and VAT generated for the host government," Witham said.

Edited by Creamer Media Reporter

Comments

The content you are trying to access is only available to subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, you can Login Here.

If you are not a subscriber, you can subscribe now, by selecting one of the below options.

For more information or assistance, please contact us at subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za.

Option 1 (equivalent of R125 a month):

Receive a weekly copy of Creamer Media's Engineering News & Mining Weekly magazine
(print copy for those in South Africa and e-magazine for those outside of South Africa)
Receive daily email newsletters
Access to full search results
Access archive of magazine back copies
Access to Projects in Progress
Access to ONE Research Report of your choice in PDF format

Option 2 (equivalent of R375 a month):

All benefits from Option 1
PLUS
Access to Creamer Media's Research Channel Africa for ALL Research Reports, in PDF format, on various industrial and mining sectors including Electricity; Water; Energy Transition; Hydrogen; Roads, Rail and Ports; Coal; Gold; Platinum; Battery Metals; etc.

Already a subscriber?

Forgotten your password?

MAGAZINE & ONLINE

SUBSCRIBE

RESEARCH CHANNEL AFRICA

SUBSCRIBE

CORPORATE PACKAGES

CLICK FOR A QUOTATION