The National Business Initiative, together with Corruption Watch (CW) and independent London-based global think tank Overseas Development Institute (ODI), have launched the ‘Transparency in Corporate Reporting 2020’ report.

The report evaluates the transparency of corporate reporting by 100 companies operating in South Africa.

It assesses the public disclosure practices of these companies based on their anticorruption programmes (ACPs), levels of organisational transparency and country-by-country reporting mechanisms.

This report is part of Transparency International’s series of reports, Transparency in Corporate Reporting, which evaluates the disclosure practices of major companies in countries around the world, highlighting how transparency is key to combating corruption and enabling accountability.

To mark the release of the report, the three partner organisations hosted a webinar to present and discuss the findings and recommendations.

The companies included in the report represent all industries and include 61 JSE-listed companies, 11 large privately owned companies, seven State-owned enterprises and 21 foreign multinationals – of which eight have JSE listings.

The focus is on corporate reporting practices and transparency around activities and performance, with a view to measuring the anticorruption standing of key private-sector players in the country.

In terms of ACPs, the partners looked at whether companies have anticorruption policies in place and what stakeholders it covers, as well as whether it speaks to the materiality of corruption.

The partners also evaluated public information on the companies to determine whether they have information relating to the human and financial resources allocated to ACPs, as well as whether they have a whistleblower mechanism in place and what the sanctions are for corruption.

The aspect of organisational transparency related to whether companies are conducting training and communicating their ACPs, and to which stakeholders, as well as whether companies report on incidents of corruption.

Country-by-country reporting related to financial data and whether companies report on profits made, taxes paid and capital expenditure incurred in other countries they operate in.

The average score of the 100 companies across the three themes was 59.5%. Broken down by theme, the companies had an average score of 58.7% for ACPs, 89.9% for organisational transparency and 36.2% for country-by-country reporting.

Twelve companies scored below 30%, while 14 companies scored above 80%.
Rand Merchant Bank, City Lodge, Exxaro Resources, FirstRand and Standard Bank were among the highest scoring respondents, averaging a 85.2% score across all themes.

CW executive director David Lewis, together with CW primary researcher Melusi Ncala and CW project associate Tawanda Kaseke, explains that there was a considerable gap between the leading firms and the sample average, indicating that there is much room for improvement for most companies surveyed in relation to their reporting and transparency.

They add that companies that are listed on the JSE, which are regulated by the exchange, fared much better than privately owned companies that are not subject to regulatory requirements.

This is evident in the 66.3% average scored by JSE-listed companies across all three themes, against the 26.7% scored by private companies.

In contrast, seven State-owned enterprises assessed in the report, as a group, averaged just below the full sample, with an overall score of 58.1%, coming in above foreign-owned companies, which averaged 57.4%.

The top performing sectors in the survey were retail and tourism, averaging a score of 70.7% in ACPs and 69.1% overall, followed by finance, insurance and real estate averaging a score of 65.1% for ACPs and 65.5% overall, and heavy industry and machinery, scoring 62.1% for ACPs and 61.9% overall.

The worst performing sectors were found to be logistics and transport, information and communication technology and construction.

ODI senior research fellow Stephen Gelb says the aim of this report is to highlight areas for improvement in corporate governance, particularly in assisting the South African private sector to be more rigorous in reporting about its ACPs, as well as the implementation thereof.

The report recommends including more detail in anticorruption policies that encompass all stakeholder groups and types of corruption, prohibiting contributions to political organisations and individuals, and defining how the company can help to end corruption.

Indeed, Lewis notes that one of the poorest-scoring questions for the sample of companies was on whether company policy explicitly proscribed contributions to political organisations and individuals.

“The need should be obvious for companies to adopt this position and be seen to have done so, yet many companies still have not.”

The report mentions that the fight against corruption cannot be waged within individual corporations alone, but must extend across a broad scope of stakeholders within and outside the business sector.

Lewis states that reporting on a range of social, environmental and governance issues has become custom, owing to a combination of legislative requirement and peer pressure.

CW intends to do a further study on at least four South African companies and do a deep-dive examination on what makes a company more vulnerable to corruption.

Former JSE CEO Nicky Newton-King says that, instead of trying to overregulate what corporates are required to report on, stakeholders should instead set a precedent of what they expect before, for example, investing in a corporate company or procuring services from a privately owned company.