https://www.miningweekly.com

EU states agree to delay 'green' investment guide, leave it open to nuclear, coal

25th September 2019

By: Reuters

  

Font size: - +

BRUSSELS – An effort to set standards for determining which financial products qualify as "green" should be delayed until the end of 2022, European Union governments agreed on Wednesday, and might end up including investments in coal and nuclear power.

The delay, if confirmed by EU lawmakers, could slow the growth of the $200-billion market for green bonds, by pushing back clearer standards that many investors wanted.

Deciding which investments could be called green was part of a legislative proposal put forward last year by the European Commission, the EU's executive arm. Its goal was to encourage private investment in environmentally sustainable businesses.

The proposal laid out a taxonomy – a set of criteria and methodologies for deciding what made an investment green – that was due to take effect in 2020. But many EU members objected, fearing damage to their national industries. They wanted more time to assess the standards.

Diplomats agreed to postpone introduction of the taxonomy by more than two years. They also agreed to grant governments more powers to decide which investments are green, amending procedures proposed by the commission that would have given independent experts more say.

NUCLEAR CONCERNS

Their compromise does not exclude any economic activity from being listed as green. That could pave the way for declaring as green investments meant to reduce the environmental impact of a coal-fired plant or a nuclear reactor.

The decision runs counter to recommendations from an EU expert group, which had advised in June excluding nuclear and coal-fired plants from the EU taxonomy. Their environmental impact was seen as going against EU targets to cut carbon emissions and reduce hazardous waste.

The text agreed by EU governments needs the approval of the European Parliament, which also wanted to rule out nuclear and coal investments from projects deemed green.

By setting criteria on what investment is sustainable, the EU hoped to avoid different standards in its 28 states and increase the confidence of climate-conscious investors. Proliferating standards let companies "greenwash" their activities, claiming green credential they not deserve.

However, the EU taxonomy's broad criteria could divert money to technologies that "cannot be considered either safe or sustainable," Germany said in a statement appended to the compromise text and also signed by Austria and Luxembourg.

The compromise, ignored those concerns and tried instead to allay opposing fears of countries such as France, which relies on nuclear energy, and eastern European nations, which still depend on coal.

Edited by Reuters

Comments

The content you are trying to access is only available to subscribers.

If you are already a subscriber, you can Login Here.

If you are not a subscriber, you can subscribe now, by selecting one of the below options.

For more information or assistance, please contact us at subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za.

Option 1 (equivalent of R125 a month):

Receive a weekly copy of Creamer Media's Engineering News & Mining Weekly magazine
(print copy for those in South Africa and e-magazine for those outside of South Africa)
Receive daily email newsletters
Access to full search results
Access archive of magazine back copies
Access to Projects in Progress
Access to ONE Research Report of your choice in PDF format

Option 2 (equivalent of R375 a month):

All benefits from Option 1
PLUS
Access to Creamer Media's Research Channel Africa for ALL Research Reports, in PDF format, on various industrial and mining sectors including Electricity; Water; Energy Transition; Hydrogen; Roads, Rail and Ports; Coal; Gold; Platinum; Battery Metals; etc.

Already a subscriber?

Forgotten your password?

MAGAZINE & ONLINE

SUBSCRIBE

RESEARCH CHANNEL AFRICA

SUBSCRIBE

CORPORATE PACKAGES

CLICK FOR A QUOTATION