JOHANNESBURG (miningweekly.com) –Thorium may in time surpass uranium as a nuclear fuel, says former Uranium One CEO Neal Froneman.
While remaining bullish on uranium, the current Gold One CEO says that thorium has a fuel cycle of its own.
"You will hear a lot more about thorium from an energy point of view in the not-too-distant future," he adds.
He says that Gold One's iron-oxide-copper-gold deposit at Etendeka, in Namibia contains both uranium and thorium, and is "very much an Olympic Dam-type deposit".
Gold One has an exclusive prospecting licence over the 65 000 ha in the Outjo district of north-western Namibia.
In addition, many of the reefs within the Aflease Gold portfolio, out of which Gold One is being formed through a reverse takeover of BMA Gold of Australia, are uranium-bearing.
While Gold One is not currently uranium focused, Froneman says that uranium continues to have "a good long-term future, and thorium will become more and more important in the nuclear fuel cycle".
Moreover, Froneman may not do business in uranium at this point in time, as he is under a restraint of trade until February next year.
"I look forward to that date," he says.
"At this point in time, the rest of the world is not set up to use thorium, but thorium could well, in the next 15 to 20 years, become a replacement for uranium, and we would like to be on the front foot if that turns out to be the case," Froneman adds.
Results at Etendeka show "very high" thorium grades.
DOMINION URANIUM
Froneman, as Uranium One CEO, was instrumental in developing Dominion, but the Klerksdorp uranium project has since been placed on care-and-maintenance.
"What has happened at Dominion is disappointing, but perhaps all I can say is that the Dominion orebody is exactly the same orebody we thought it was, the plant works, and I look past Dominion to the rest of Uranium One, and see a very bright future for Uranium One," he says.
He surmises from Uranium One's own reports that the ramp-up of the Dominion project took longer than expected and was consuming scarce cash.
Froneman believes that the decision to place the mine on care-and-maintenance until the financial markets change may yet prove a "smart" decision.
He remains a "strong believer" in Dominion and says that he continues to find uranium "as attractive as ever".
To see a video on Neal Froneman's comments on uranium and thorium, go to www.miningweekly.com and click first on ‘Multimedia" and then on ‘Video Clips'.
By: Martin Creamer
24th November 2008
Edited by: Creamer Media Reporter
Topics in this article
| City | Company | Country | Industry Term |
| Person | Published Medium | Sports Event | |
Readers Comments
No doubt, Mr. Froneman is sitting on a thorium reserve. It would seem he's trying to put his spin on, the same as at the time of SXR joint venture, to inflate his share options in readiness of jumping ship - credibility has expired.
>User not found. on 25th November 2008
Indians have always been most motivated to use thorium and have even a research reactor working on thorium-233U cycle. The chairman of Indian AEC puts the thorium use for power decades away. This is due to paucity of fissile material required to be added to thorium for its use as fuel.
Only the fissile resources of countries that hold them combined with the motivation of Indian scientists can bring the thorium use closer. Is it likely to happen?
>User not found. on 26th November 2008
Its very unlikely Etendeka will turn out to be an Olympic dam-style deposit as Mr Froneman asserts- from the info I have seen its a small gold-copper deposit- what confirmed mineral resource numbers are we talking here? It was only two years ago that Reefton Mining hyped up an extensive uranium find- which turned out to be thorium- on its Black Mtn base metal deposit in central Namibia, producing a short term share bounce. Lets hope the same is not the object here. Meanwhile Xemplar Energy has found the presence of thorium means that the Warmbad uranium deposit in sthn Namibia is not of Rossing-style significance as it originally claimed.
>User not found. on 26th November 2008
Andrew (Strahaven), I am new to this board and the mining industry. I do not know about Froneman or about the SXR joint venture you cited. However it seems you are accusing Froneman of presenting a skewed, baseless opinion. Might readers suggest you are doing the same?
I would be interested in your reasoning as to WHY he is spinning. You say no doubt he is sitting on a thorium reserve, which I gather is somewhat tongue in cheek, but nevertheless that is pure speculation on your part. YOUR credibility would not expire if you presented reasons why his opinion on thorium is without merit, and why instead his reserves are the basis for his opinion.
>User not found. on 27th November 2008

















