“Also, recent calls by the president of the ANC youth wing and Cosatu to nationalise mining create shivers in the international investment com- munity and significantly reduce foreign direct invest-ment, despite a rebuttal by government.
“Next door, in Zimbabwe, there is talk of government owning 51% of any mining investment. “In Zambia, the government constantly changes its taxation policy, and in the Democratic Republic of Congo, contracts are being reviewed to suit new government preferences.
“These changes are, of course, driven by a justifiable desire to give ownership of resources to the people, or to enhance the benefits from resources to the people, but, in business terms, that is often viewed as government interference, and financiers and investors tend to look elsewhere at the slightest hint of interference.
“So, effectively, African governments hold the key to maintaining the attractiveness of this continent’s mining sector, and that key is direct engagement with companies and a sharing of ideas that lead to policies that satisfy both sides.
“For example, instead of the South African government starting its own mining company, it could draw up proposals of what it wishes to be done by private business and invite counterproposals, and the two sides could meet halfway.
“In Zimbabwe, the government could require a reasonably lower percentage, which would be attractive to business, and so on.
“Overall, a consistent and positive message to investors and accompanying actions are needed to keep foreign direct investment flowing,” Shapiro said.
To subscribe to Mining Weekly's print magazine email subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za or buy now.





.gif)















_bme_new_120x360_nostone.gif)

