GOLD 1726.30 $/ozChange: -11.90
PLATINUM 1622.49 $/ozChange: -2.51
R/$ exchange 7.52Change: 0.12
R/€ exchange 9.90Change: 0.15
 
We have detected that the browser you are using is no longer supported. As a result, some content may not display correctly.
We suggest that you upgrade to the latest version of any of the following browsers:
         
close notification
powered by
Advanced Search
 
 
 
Home
 
Most Popular Articles
 
 
GOLD
Kinross still defending Red Back deal
 
4th September 2010
TEXT SIZE
Text Smaller Disabled Text Bigger
 

TORONTO (miningweekly.com) – Kinrooss Gold said on Friday it “rejects” a negative recommendation by proxy advisory firm Institutional Shareholder Services on the gold miner's $7-billion acquisition of West Africa-focused Red Back Mining.

The Toronto-based gold miner agreed in early August to buy West Africa-focused Red Back for about $7-billion in shares and warrants.

The deal has been criticised as being too dilutive, and some shareholders and analysts suggested Kinross may be overpaying.

Red Back's two producing mines are Tasiast, in Mauritania, and Chirano in Ghana, and the question of value largely hangs on the growth potential at Tasiast, which already has reserves of five-million ounces of gold.

Kinross CEO Tye Burt has literally asked shareholders to trust him that the deal will be accretive, citing an extensive, "boots on the ground" due diligence conducted this year, but says the company cannot give any more details for now.

In a relatively strongly worded statement on Friday, Kinross said ISS's conclusions “reflect a lack of technical understanding and knowledge of early-stage mining property valuation, and the potential to create value for shareholders by identifying and acquiring high-potential properties”.

The gold-miner also pointed out that the deal has received a positive recommendation from another firm, Glass, Lewis and Co.

“The companies strongly recommend that their shareholders vote in favour of the transaction based on previously stated unanimous recommendations by the boards of directors and management of both companies, the view of Glass Lewis, a total of six fairness opinions from respected financial institutions, and the exhaustive due diligence conducted to support the transaction.”

Shareholders in both Kinross and Red Back are scheduled to vote on September 15.

Kinross already issued a statement earlier this week, in response to “questions” from ISS, in which it expanded on the due diligence it did on Red Back's assets, plans for expansion at the company's Tasiast mine, in Mauritania, and the rationale for the deal.

“It is standard practice in the mining industry to make acquisitions based on in-depth, professional evaluations of the expected long-term potential of an orebody, even though that potential has not been clearly delineated according to NI 43-101 requirements at the time of acquisition,” Kinross argued on Friday.

Edited by: Liezel Hill
FULL Access to Mining Weekly and Engineering News - Subscribe Now!
Subscribe Now Login
 
 
 
 
 
Hide Comments  
 
Readers Comments
 
image image
In all fairness ISS should have its say as well, quote Victor Li from ISS: “While it remains possible there is significantly more gold in the ground than is reflected in current reserves or analyst estimates, the transaction itself would force [Kinross] shareholders to pay a very full price — including a market premium — for the privilege of taking on the risk of that bet,” ISS analyst Victor Li wrote as he urged investors to reject the deal." Why gamble if it makes no sense to gamble. I also noticed a reaction after the ISS advisory, Kinross went up and Redback went down, the valuation spread is widening. The market is showing it doesn't like the deal, expect Kinross to pop upwards if the deal is rejected.
image image 
image
Anonymous on 4th September 2010
 
Kinross Gold CEO Tye Burt
 
Picture by: Reuters
Kinross Gold CEO Tye Burt